Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Nice! Looks interesting even without textures.
> 
> Render at 1600x1600 and downscale in gimp or your photo editor of choice? It's
> worked for me in the past. You won't need such high aa settings for the rest of
> the scene either in that case.

Thanks!  That's a good idea.  I think you or someone suggested that to 
me once before for some other scene, but I completely forgot.

-- 
// The Mildly Infamous Blue Herring
#version 3.61;#include"functions.inc"global_settings{assumed_gamma
2.2}isosurface{function{-f_strophoid(x/2-.45,y,z*3,1,1.2,1,1.5)-.05}
contained_by{box{<-2.1,-1,-1/3>,<1.4,1,1/3>}}max_gradient 12inverse
hollow pigment{rgbf 1}interior{media{samples 8 emission<3,80,150>/255
density{crackle metric 1color_map{[0rgb 6][.03rgb 0][1rgb 0]}scale<1,
2,1>warp{turbulence<.5,.75,.5>}scale 1/3}}}translate z*3}

Post a reply to this message