Darren New wrote:

> The pendant in me wants to have an actual condition as the argument to 
> "while". :-)  Or at least
> 
> do {
>   ....
> } while (number != target);

Yeah - although that would require "number" to be declared outside the 
while loop so that it actually exists. ;-) More subtly, it would have to 
be initialised to a value that is guaranteed to not equal "target". Ooo, 
*that* could be a nasty bug to try to find...!

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message