Invisible wrote:
>>> I get around 10 to 18 fps which is 'playable'.
>>
>> o_O
> 
> You've never played Quake II on a Pentium 233 MHz with 16 MB RAM and no 
> 3D hardware, have you?

No, but only because I never *had* a Pentium 233 :)  I went straight 
form a Pentium 166 to an AMD K6-2 300 (or 350, can't remember now).

>> Anything less than 30 consistently gives me rather bad headaches.  I 
>> try to keep things running at 50+, though (obviously, 75+ is best, but 
>> not feasible for me on modern games).
> 
> Uh-huh. And you understand that your monitor only physically draws 60 
> frames each second anyway, right?

Actually, it draws 75 per second :)

Besides, this is something I've found I'm more sensitive to as I age. 
Sure, I *used* to play all those old games that ran at, like, 20-30fps, 
but I can't *anymore*.

...Chambers

Post a reply to this message