"Stephen" <mcavoysAT@aolDOTcom> wrote in message 
news:pdcda4d18v73c4feh22jl72ou3fqujs9a0@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 10:43:04 +0100, "St." <dot### [at] dotcom> wrote:
>
>>"It follows that for every TC, (TC = RTC) is A-true or TC is A-equivalent 
>>to
>>RTC. .... Hence, (TC - RTC) is never false."
>>
>>    jstor.org
>>
>>     WOW!  :)
>
> Good to know and better than looking at chicken guts :)

   Heh, I'm not going to ask what you've been doing today! ;)

    Do you Stephen, (or anyone else), know what that statement actually 
means? I know the result is 'never false', but 'what' is never false?

      ~Steve~


> -- 
>
> Regards
>     Stephen

Post a reply to this message