Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> So just that I get you right: Are you suggesting because your code can trick 
> a specific compiler on a specific architecture to produce slightly better 
> code for some processors of that architecture, the current code in POV-Ray 
> should be changed? Or is your code universally better on an algorithmic level?

  The current mandel_pattern() function could be kept, and his version
called for all the other variants.

  If enough compilers and platforms show that his variant is always faster
than the regular mandel_pattern(), then the latter could be dropped at some
point.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message