|
 |
On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 07:02:35 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 13:58:53 -0400, Warp wrote:
>
>> > What is the alternative? A panel of experts in the field? Or a lone
>> > judge?
>
>> A lone judge is the alternative.
>
> Thus not what I was talking about.
Well, in the US, that's the choice - a jury, or you can leave it up to
the judge, who will apply his expertise in law and combine that with
expertise from experts called to testify.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|
