On Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:52:10 -0700, stbenge wrote:

> He wrote that *before* your mention of asses and courts. You can't sue
> someone for mere words, can you? 

Well, you can when it comes to libel, but he's not approached anything 
libelous.  As for *suing*, I never made the claim that I was going to sue 
*him* - funny how some will take a mention of court as "dude, I'm going 
to so SUE your butt".  As mentioned in my recent reply to AQ, I'm on the 
defending side.  Oh, and the person who had the summons issued by the 
court in question was so convinced he could win, he went to *small 
claims*.  

AQ strikes me as being somewhat similar in nature - disrespect for 
authority (except for his deity of choice, it would seem) and full of 
words, some of which even make sense. ;-)

> Maybe aQ's plonked nature means you
> can't read every post written by him...

Nah, I read with my ignored posts showing.  The score shows up in black 
so I remember that I've flagged the poster as ignored, but it's sometimes 
too hard to resist a response, try as I might.  When people say 
ridiculous things, I have a hard time holding back. ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message