Warp wrote:
> triple_r <nomail@nomail> wrote:
>> It's not
>> that I'm disagreeing with you, but it's also an idealization to assume a small
>> group of professionals is able to make just decisions.
> 
>   At least they can have the necessary education and experience, which
> random people don't have.

Education and experience in what? Law enforcement? We already have them. 
Prosecutors and judges.  The prosecutor can drop the case. The judge can 
dismiss the case. You have to explain to a lawyer, a judge, *and* a jury 
before people get convicted. No jury can falsely convict you of a crime 
without the experts in law and criminology already falsely prosecuting 
you for the crime.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message