|
|
On Wed, 23 Apr 2008 20:37:40 +0100, Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Gail Shaw wrote:
>
>> They're good. Read Magician. Seriously. It's an excellent book.
>> Technically it's the first of a trilogy, but it stands alone quite
>> well.
>
> Actually, I recall a number of people urging me to read The Hobbit.
> After a chapter or two I was bored stupid. Watching paint dry would have
> been more fun.
>
> Oddly, the LotR films are really quite good. I don't know how they
> managed to get so much excitement out of such a dull series of books...
Well, I found the books to be good, but they are heavy on exposition. It
translated to films well, I think, because instead of exposition on what
the mountains looked like, we just had a picture to look at. The scouts
did very well, I thought, in scouting locations that evoked the images of
the books.
I hope they do get the Hobbit film(s) made.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|