>>  Personally I also oppose that type of "pronounciation syntax" which
>> looks more like the writer is having rough sex than anything else.
> 
> So that is what rough sex looks like. I did not know, thanks ;)

I feel I should interject something whitty here. But... seriously... I 
think it's already been done. Woah.

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=734

[Note final panel.]

That's the best I could manage. :-S

-- 
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*

Post a reply to this message