Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguycom> wrote:
> >> Anyway, Silicon is a semiconductor, not a nonconductor.  Normally, it's 
> >> a very poor conductor, but when doped becomes the equivalent of a 
> >> superconductor.
> > 
> >   Uh? Maybe you should check your physics again?
> > 

> Which part - my description of semiconductors, or my classification of 
> Silicon as one?

  Your comparison of doped silicon to a superconductor.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message