|
 |
Warp wrote:
> Chambers <ben### [at] pacificwebguy com> wrote:
>> Anyway, Silicon is a semiconductor, not a nonconductor. Normally, it's
>> a very poor conductor, but when doped becomes the equivalent of a
>> superconductor.
>
> Uh? Maybe you should check your physics again?
>
Which part - my description of semiconductors, or my classification of
Silicon as one?
I'll admit that I could be wrong about Silicon being a semiconductor; I
just assumed it was one because it's commonly used in semiconductors.
However, the rest of the description is fairly accurate, if a bit
simplified.
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|
|
