Slime wrote:
> Of course, if you see the framerate dropping for this reason, the *best* 
> solution is to admit that you're doing more work than you can handle in the 
> time you have, and either increase the timestep, reduce the number of 
> objects being simulated, or optimize physics engine. =) (It doesn't hurt to 
> have a fallback, of course.)

Unfortunately, we always seem to come back to a dynamic timestep.  I 
suppose the "best" solution would be to have a range of timesteps that 
are acceptable, and to keep it as low as possible, but never out of this 
range.

-- 
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com

Post a reply to this message