Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Chambers wrote:
> 
>> Thanks, I got it sorted out.  I still don't know what the error was, 
>> but switching from preallocating the arrays to allocating new ones 
>> every step & throwing them away when done solved the problem.
>>
>> So there must have been some carryover somewhere that I missed.
> 
> Ah, the evils of mutable state...
> 
> 
> ...er, wait, ignore me. [Oh, you already are...]
> 

I'm not ignoring you.  It was from reading all your posts on Haskell 
that I got interested in immutable values to begin with.  While I'm 
still not using them very much, at least now they're in the back of my 
mind :)

-- 
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com

Post a reply to this message