Chambers wrote:
> Thanks, I got it sorted out. I still don't know what the error was, but > switching from preallocating the arrays to allocating new ones every > step & throwing them away when done solved the problem.> > So there must have been some carryover somewhere that I missed.
Ah, the evils of mutable state...
...er, wait, ignore me. [Oh, you already are...]
--
http://blog.orphi.me.uk/
http://www.zazzle.com/MathematicalOrchid*
