Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>>
>> It'll also be helpful to avoid the whole "what secret stuff is MS 
>> leaking into my documents" kind of MS-added-an-NSA-cryptokey complaint.
>>
> 
> That's assuming MS is not going to add plenty of non-standard tags in 
> their own implementation...
> 
> What will you think of a big binary blob between tags bearing the very 
> explicit name <newUndocumentedTag3425543>  :-) ?

I think it'll probably be unnecessary for you to parse it in order to 
(a) follow the standard and (b) get reasonable results.

Why, what do *you* think would happen?

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message