Invisible wrote:
> This strikes me as bad documentation, frankly...

For Erlang, I think it's forgivable. It started as a custom-built 
language for one company (where you'd expect to be hanging around with a 
bunch of people who can answer questions), and the actual flaws in the 
documentation I'm attributing at least in part to the fact that it was 
created in a country where English isn't the native language. (It makes 
some of the sentences where they're trying to be mathematically precise 
even more confusing than if they just stated what they meant informally.)

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message