Chambers wrote:
> Darren New wrote:
>> I wasn't advocating the lawyers taking a case even if they think they 
>> won't be paid. Indeed, getting lawyers to not take silly cases was 
>> kind of the point. :-)  I was simply considering "how do you keep 
>> someone wealthy from using 'attack lawyers' to screw up someone who 
>> has done nothing wrong but can't afford a defense lawyer?"
> 
> By countersuing for frivolous harassment and asking for attorney's fees 
> plus damages?

Yeah, you can afford the lawyer up front to do this. :-)  It's the "up 
front" that's the problem. Ma and Pa Kettle aren't going to have $100K 
to borrow.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message