Darren New wrote:
> I wasn't advocating the lawyers taking a case even if they think they
> won't be paid. Indeed, getting lawyers to not take silly cases was kind
> of the point. :-) I was simply considering "how do you keep someone
> wealthy from using 'attack lawyers' to screw up someone who has done
> nothing wrong but can't afford a defense lawyer?"
By countersuing for frivolous harassment and asking for attorney's fees
plus damages?
--
...Ben Chambers
www.pacificwebguy.com
Post a reply to this message
|