Chris B escribió:
> OTOH, because it's a form that was extremely common both in the real world 
> and in art before Pixar used it, I don't think a model of a lamp would have 
> to be hugely different from the Pixar one for the author to be able to claim 
> complete ownership of their model. Aspects that could be unique to Pixar are 
> the precise profiles of the base and the lampshade and the shapes of the 
> joints. Also, the relative dimensions of the 'baby' lamp could distinguise 
> this particular lamp (in particular if these don't match any real-world 
> lamps).

What about the ball? I recognized it was Luxo Jr just for the ball texture.

Post a reply to this message