Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> So there's no good way of seeing how much your peak memory is, or your 
> disk I/O rate, or how much network bandwidth you're taking up, because 
> you'd have to build each of these reporting infrastructures from 
> scratch. There's no "performance monitor" kind of thing where you could 
> implement *just* the memory watcher and already have the libraries to 
> track peak, average, etc.

  Yet there are plenty of resource monitors which can show cpu usage,
bandwidths, memory usage, disk usage, and lots of info on a per-process
basis ('top' being the basic example).

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message