Vincent Le Chevalier wrote:
> In this specific case, someone implementing the standard and discarding 
> the parts "doLikeWordn.nnn" is not choosing a behaviour where the 
> standard does not say what should happen, or not implementing an 
> extension, he is plainly not respecting the standard.

Oh, and incidentally, if you *care* whether "doLikeWordn.nn" works, ODF 
isn't going to work for you either. ODF doesn't say how to break lines 
(at least that I could find), so if you *need* the word breaking to be 
in this mode, you *can't* use Open Office or something like that. If you 
*don't* need the word breaking to be right, you can use some converter 
that ignores this flag.

Note this flag is irrelevant to writing a spell checker, a document 
indexer, etc as well, so the argument is kind of silly in that way, too.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message