scott wrote:
> You mean you don't want the Q9550 or QX9770? ;-)
I think even Q9450 is slightly too expensive. The two you mentioned are
priced waaaaayyy too high considering the fact that you can overclock
Q9450 to work at higher frequencies than Q9550@stock. And I'm very used
to OCing.
> FWIW I'm getting an E8500 (to replace my old P4) which is a 45nm
> Core2Duo... I opted for it because I will be mainly using it for a
> single-core application so no need for Quad Core. The performance
> really does look impressive though.
Yes, at this point there are still only a few apps that benefit from
multiple cores - even 2 cores. So for most people there is no point
getting a quad core. But things change constantly.
Post a reply to this message
|