Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Perhaps I'm not understanding correctly - video data typically eats a 
> few GB per minute. So why do you need 1,000 GB? That's, like, several 
> *hours* of video data. You'd have to be producing a feature film or 
> something to need more, surely?

I took nine hours of video on my vacation to Africa. Editted down to (I 
think) 2.

It's sitting on tapes, waiting for me to pull it in to burn to DVD, now 
that I have that capabilitiy.

-- 
   Darren New / San Diego, CA, USA (PST)
     "That's pretty. Where's that?"
          "It's the Age of Channelwood."
     "We should go there on vacation some time."

Post a reply to this message