Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> Perhaps I'm not understanding correctly - video data typically eats a 
> few GB per minute. So why do you need 1,000 GB? That's, like, several 
> *hours* of video data. You'd have to be producing a feature film or 
> something to need more, surely?

First of all, you'll have easily more than twice the data you'll 
actually need. While shooting video you'll get *a lot* of misshoots.

Secondly, you'll need some scratch space. So the 1000GB can be divided 
by 3 or 4 in the first place - 250 or 333GB ain't so much anymore...

-- 
Eero "Aero" Ahonen
    http://www.zbxt.net
       aer### [at] removethiszbxtnetinvalid

Post a reply to this message