On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:25:05 +0000, St. wrote:

> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
> news:47eac921$1@news.povray.org...
>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 22:03:54 +0000, St. wrote:
>>
>>> "Jim Henderson" <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote in message
>>> news:47eabf74$1@news.povray.org...
>>>> On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 16:24:30 -0500, Jim Henderson wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> twaking
>>>>
>>>> s/twaking/tweaking/
>>>>
>>>> McKean's law strikes again.....
>>>
>>>   No, "Sods Law" will suffice... ;)
>>
>> Well, maybe, but McKean's law is much more apropos to the situation,
>> no?
> 
>     True, true. But Sod's Law will always sneak in there at some point,
>     so
> it's got to be relevant. I mean, at some stage when I'm composing an
> email or a reply post in OE and I type the word 'the', it will get
> repeated twice in a sentence - but I *know* I only typed the word once
> once once. (Joking. :) What a weird word 'once' is).

Language is a funny thing.  I heard the construct "is was" the other 
day.  The context was "the question is was this the question?" (not 
exactly, but in that structure).  Funny to listen to....

>     Sods Law. Otherwise, something weird is going on.  :oO

LOL!

Jim

Post a reply to this message