Chris B nous apporta ses lumieres en ce 2008/03/06 05:33:
> "Chris B" <nom### [at] nomailcom> wrote in message 
> news:47c18eb9@news.povray.org...
>> "Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message 
>> news:47c1525e$1@news.povray.org...
>>> Chris B wrote:
>>>> Hi, Yes I think that looks better. Renders about 6 times slower though.
>>>  Still looks grainy.
>> The last image I posted used 8 BlurSamples. This one uses 40 and still 
>> looks a little grainy, as well as increasing the render time from 3 
>> minutes with the original surface to 2hours 23 minutes.
>>
> 
> I've uploaded the Labeller macros onto the POV-Ray object collection. I used 
> an image generated with 50 BlurSamples for the main image in the end which 
> took a lot longer to render and still looks grainier than the Rubiks Revenge 
> image.
> 
> See:  http://lib.povray.org/collection/labeller/chrisb%201.0/labeller.html
> 
> Regards,
> Chris B. 
> 
> 
Are you using the micronormals bluring? Try the large normals method:
You use normal with a large scale, like scale 1000, and move randomly by large 
amounts: translate<rand(R),rand(R),rand(R)>*1000

-- 
Alain
-------------------------------------------------
Grabel's Law: 2 is not equal to 3 -- not even for large values of 2.

Post a reply to this message