>   It's horribly ugly C code. I have made a clean C++ implementation if
> you are interested.
> 
>   I measured the algorithm (compiled with g++ 4.1.2), and with my
> computer (Pentium4 3.4GHz) it generated 150 million random numbers per
> second. According to the author the randomness should be of very high
> quality (cryptographically strong).

How do the ugly C code and your clean implementation compare in terms of 
performance? Pure curiosity.

Post a reply to this message