Warp wrote:
> Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>> This is not a bug, it is an internal buffer that trades speed for memory 
>> limits. It should not be needed, but a better solution is complicated and 
>> time intensive to implement.
> 
>   Could the reaching this limit be detected and a better error message be
> shown?

I said a better solution is possible, did I not? ;-)

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message