Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
> This is not a bug, it is an internal buffer that trades speed for memory 
> limits. It should not be needed, but a better solution is complicated and 
> time intensive to implement.

  Could the reaching this limit be detected and a better error message be
shown? Now it looks just like a regular "out of memory" error while it
really isn't, as it's a particular special case. Perhaps a more informative
message could be better in this situation.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message