|
 |
"Larry Hudson" <org### [at] yahoo com> wrote in message
news:47a7caf9$1@news.povray.org...
> St. wrote:
>> "B. Gimeno" <nomail@nomail> wrote in message
>> news:web.47a71fc94cd5f3622683f30c0@news.povray.org...
>>
>>>Jan Dvorak <jan### [at] centrumcz> wrote:
>>>
>>>>jhu napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>>>It's been over a year now. Is something else taking its place?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>tc-rtc.co.uk
>>>>see a few threads upward
>>>
>>>I lament it, but this substitute is not able to replace the spirit of the
>>>original aid. It's an opiniation, the proposed subjects are not as "open"
>>>as
>>>long ago because usually they are based on unknown works that stops most
>>>of the
>>>non-english-speakers users of POV-Ray. Resignation.
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your support. For what it's worth, and in my
>> understanding, the IRTC is on "hiatus".
>>
>> I'll make sure the next topic is "Glass" - now that *should* bring
>> about 186+ entries in.
>>
>> ~Steve~
>
> Slightly different question/comment: Since the TC-RTC like the IRTC is
> open to all renderers, is there anything being done to publicize it in the
> non-POV-Ray world? If so, ignore my comment. I'm only familiar with
> POV-Ray myself, but I like the idea of these competitions being open to
> all (And as to familiarity, my knowledge/ability is "spotty" at best, and
> I've never entered either IRTC or TC-RTC. I'm just a lurker in these, but
> I like to see all the great work being done.) ;-)
Hey, thanks for your observations, much appreciated, lurker or not. ;)
Well, as for promoting the site, to be honest, no, I haven't promoted it
yet. This is for a reason, and that reason is that I want to make sure
everyone is happy with the voting and commenting code, so that it works
properly. So far, so good - no complaints. This is the last round where I
judge this, so I should be promoting the TC-RTC soon.
Anyway, I know what I have to do, but it still may take some time to hold
Googles' hand. :/
~Steve~
>
> -=- Larry -=-
Post a reply to this message
|
|
