Trevor G Quayle wrote:
> Perhaps moving to a system where the topic is only a single word.  This can
> surely be understandable to most while leaving the possibility open for
> anywhere from narrow to broad interpretation, simple to complex scenes.  It may
> be more palatable to a lot of artists who don't want to jump into full detailed
> scenes as opposed to more simple or abstract ones.  Even the topic "glass" as
> mentioned could have lots of possibilities beyond the obvious, and surely
> getting lots of entries is better than only getting a handful.
> .....
> Just a thought...
> 
> -tgq

Perhaps this is what you really mean, but instead of limiting the topics 
to a single word, I would suggest that this be expanded to allow short 
phrases that imply a single concept.  For example (taken directly from 
the IRTC):  Imaginary Worlds, Spectacular Landscapes, Toys & Games, 
Forces of Nature, and similar.

      -=- Larry -=-

Post a reply to this message