|
|
Phil Cook wrote:
> And lo on Fri, 28 Mar 2008 21:21:46 -0000, Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom>
> did spake, saying:
>
>> Doctor John wrote:
>>> Why is it that so many M$ users (present company excepted) defend their
>>> choice by pointing to the success of M$ as a company rather than being
>>> able to rationally discuss the pros and cons of Windows (all variants)
>>> as a stable and secure OS?
>>
>> Because non-technical people don't know about that stuff. They just
>> know that it can't be *too* bad if that many people are using it.
>> I.e., they look at the users, and trust the opinion of those who most
>> got it right.
>>
>> It's not science, it's politics.
>
> Another conversation
>
> "Millions of people can't be wrong!"
> "Why not?"
> "Um well because er if something was wrong then people would stop using it"
or
"And the first person who tried it got told 'Millions of people can't be
wrong'"
Post a reply to this message
|
|