"Stephen" <mcavoysATaolDOTcom@> wrote in message 
news:1367o3p8v2610pklir4k14rkpr8pt9keb3@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 8 Jan 2008 15:53:58 +0100, "M_a_r_c" 
> <jac### [at] wanadoofr>
> wrote:
>
>>Girl rendered
>
> Are you sure? look at her hair just above her bust. And the wrinkles on 
> the
> tunic fastening.
>
> Regards
> Stephen

... And the top part of the head looks real to me, along with the stitching 
on the tunic.
As Nemesis mentioned, the face looks a little smooth, but some touching up 
in photoshop could make a photo look like that.

The various repititions down the top half of the right hand side are 
strange. They don't look like a straight photoshop cut and paste, but it 
doesn't really look to me like a modelled repeat either. Maybe a cut, paste 
and some sophisticated merge in photoshop.

Following Warp's style of logic, I'm assuming it can't be all a photo, 
otherwise the post would have started with 'Off-topic'. :-)

My guess would be the face and the hair on either side of the face are 
rendered, the rest is a photo (with some photoshop cleaning done top right).

Regards,
Chris B.

Post a reply to this message