Warp wrote:
> Thorsten Froehlich <tho### [at] trfde> wrote:
>> A algorithm with up to n**2 complexity per pixel afaict (wthout checking in
>> detail) from some of the existing algorithms.
> 
>   With n being what?
> 
>   Well, anyways, this sounds all too complicated. I'm doing this just as
> a hobby, not as my payjob. I'm not finding too much motivation to study
> dozens of pages of complicated math for this. Unless someone can give me
> a simple algorithm I can implement, I'm really sorry.

FYI, when I was looking into this years ago, I pushed it back as too much
work for too little gain ;-)

	Thorsten

Post a reply to this message