Warp wrote:
> Shay <Sha### [at] cccc> wrote:
>> C) Invent and code a new programming language and then code the 
>> algorithm in that language.
> 
> Right, because all that is necessary for every single algorithm which
> will be ever made for POV-Ray.
> 

Not quite. I suppose one set of commands would take care of a handful of 
converters. The mesh-handling stuff? Well there's decimation for 
marching cubes of isosurfaces or CSG. Subdivision? Of what? Who creates 
mesh models without a mouse (except me)?

This will all sound a lot better after someone has taken care of the 
many things that POV users cannot do (rendering algorithms). After that, 
what POV users cannot *conveniently* do might seem a lot more important.

  -Shay

Post a reply to this message