|
 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
andrel wrote:
> It could also make the POV community diverge in groups with different sets
> of libraries. E.g. because some libraries are only available for a
> subset of OSes.
If that were the only problem, the extra flexibility would be well worth it.
This is one of those things that I would only expect 10% of the userbase
to even touch--if lots of people wind up needing it, it's because we
screwed something up.
Besides, we already have that showing up with people using modelers and
such. Remember that Pose-ray is Windows-only?
I'd say make as much as you can work inside of Pov (hence the argument
for a much expanded SDL that does things that people now use external
programs for), and then get out of the way of everyone that we can't
directly support.
Unless of course you want to include every obscure scientific
visualization library into Pov. ;-)
- --
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmail com -- wtr### [at] calpoly edu
You know you've been raytracing too long when you spent the whole of
Titanic wishing the actors would get out of the way.
-- Dylan Beattie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFHACaBcCmTzQ++ZncRAoRHAJ9thPyTTKsPvYOMIWxDHEn/h8yMMwCbBog2
tJM2kV5P2tat0y4KqFs+QzY=
=Tek1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Post a reply to this message
|
 |