-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Nicolas George wrote:
> My point is to show that, although it is not possible to keep exactly the
> same syntax as the current one, it is possible to use a real programming
> language while keeping the syntactic noise very low.

If we're going to re appropriate an existing language, maybe we could
look at some of the functional languages (Lisp, ML, etc.).

I don't normally like functional programming, but it does strike me as a
good match for describing scenes.

- --
William Tracy
afi### [at] gmailcom wtr### [at] calpolyedu

You know you've been raytracing too long when you're starting to find
these quotes more unsettling than funny.
    -- Alex McLeod a.k.a. Giant Robot Messiah
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG8rd4cCmTzQ++ZncRApKuAKChyuD1k3G5lniHBDOogM290T3pewCgshxV
BQzVutm/DGb4E6YAvPlo0P0=
=ylrj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Post a reply to this message