On Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:27:16 -0400, Warp wrote:

>> A small misunderstanding, I guess. What I proposed was to have a well
>> defined low level language (think RISC)
> 
>   A RISC without loops and control structures?

IIRC (and I probably don't), unrolling loops (in particular) is an 
optimization; but at a low level, I don't necessarily see that as a bad 
idea myself.  But the high-level language does need these structures.

Jim

Post a reply to this message