andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > andrel <a_l### [at] hotmailcom> wrote:
> >> My suggestion for a 'new' language would be to have an as simple as 
> >> possible language (without loops and control structures)
> > 
> >   Bad idea. The new language should be more powerful, not less.
> > 
> A small misunderstanding, I guess. What I proposed was to have a well 
> defined low level language (think RISC)

  A RISC without loops and control structures? I still think it's a bad idea.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message