Thomas de Groot wrote:
> "Arne Kleinophorst" <kle### [at] spamdebitelnet> schreef in bericht 
> news:46de836a$1@news.povray.org...
>> Is there any progress concerning Moray? Is it RIP or WIP?
>>
> 
> Interestingly, I suppose that Arne's original question is indirectly 
> answered by the discussion in between. Am I correct in assuming that a new 
> Moray version can only be envisioned 'after' POV version 3.7 becomes 
> operational, or 'during / after' POV version 4.0 becomes available? I am not 
> critical about anything, I am just interested to know what the current 
> thoughts about Moray are at this stage.

Looks like post-4.0 is the most realistic, though something that worries 
me is this: how long, if ever, will it take after gutting non-opensource 
code to regain similar level of functionality, and with a new SDL, will 
all prior POV data become obsolete and useless?

 From a standpoint of someone who (occasionally) uses Moray 3.5 which 
necessitates use of POV 3.5 at the most, will it be worth my while to 
migrate to a newer version, or will I be relegated to an 
ever-more-obsolete set of tools?

-- 
Tim Cook
http://home.bellsouth.net/p/PWP-empyrean

-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
Version: 3.12
GFA dpu- s: a?-- C++(++++) U P? L E--- W++(+++)>$
N++ o? K- w(+) O? M-(--) V? PS+(+++) PE(--) Y(--)
PGP-(--) t* 5++>+++++ X+ R* tv+ b++(+++) DI
D++(---) G(++) e*>++ h+ !r--- !y--
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

Post a reply to this message