"Jim Charter" <jrc### [at] msncom> schreef in bericht 
news:46dcaa58$1@news.povray.org...
>>
> The scores are a puzzle to me, seems the winner is the one that gets the 
> most responses of average or better.  For the system to work it seems that 
> every reviewer must judge every work.  If you look at the current scores 
> as ratios of points/potential points the ranking would be different.  But 
> that is not 'fair' either.  Seems the only fair way would be to enforce 
> that all review all, or else somehow attribute each entry a dummy average 
> score for each potential reviewer, then have the reviewers in effect 
> altering one of the scores up or down from average.


I have been surprised too...

Thomas

Post a reply to this message