|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Christian Froeschlin wrote:
> Looks great, especially the close-up! It seems a bit like it has
> focal blur but if the render was only 20 minutes it's probably
> just an anti-aliasing effect.
Mm, you can hack focal blur to render in that amount of time. The image
looks like it could use some more samples in the blurring, actually,
which would explain the fast rendering time. :-)
--
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you've convinced your boss
that raytracing is really an integral part of your job title (and you
really don't work in a position that requires it).
Quietly Watching
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |