|
|
"Stephen" <mcavoys_AT_aolDOT.com> schreef in bericht
news:web.46924e9fdba22c50c4e49fa40@news.povray.org...
>
> What I was thinking of was the shalwar interacting with the pirihan so
> that
> the pirihan flattens the shalwar. Also If you had a coat that had
> stiffened
> shoulders you might want to have a different bending factor for the
> shoulders than on the main part of the cloth.
Hmm, yes, that would be nice indeed. At present, Poser only interacts
forwards, not backwards...
About the coat, you could probably do that by using a separate mesh for the
shoulders, and attach (constrain) the rest of the coat to them. That would
need very careful modelling and even then I am not sure if it would work,
though. Might be worth an experiment...
>> > A scimitar?
>> > A handbag!!!
>> Hmm... you might indeed prefer to see him with a handbag if you meet him
>> at
>> night :-) However... I am afraid that he is not that type of guy. Much
>> more
>> expert with the scimitar than with the handbag ;-)
>
> Sorry Thomas, I was laughing at my own writing style. I was asking if you
> meant a scimitar instead of a sabre. The phrase "A handbag!" comes from
> the
> same play as does this quote. And it is quite famous :-)
> To lose one parent may be regarded as a misfortune; to lose both looks
> like
> carelessness.
LOL!! I confess that I missed that one! I don't know the play but it sounds
like Bernard Shaw? or Pinter? Forgive my ignorance in this.
On the other hand, the "handbag" made me look at Abdul in a different way
and there was something disquitingly depraved in his overall demeanour, so,
from one thing came the other...
I love that kind of word play :-)
Thomas
Post a reply to this message
|
|