Bill Pragnell wrote:
> Yah, the sand issue. Actually sand *can* look totally flat and textureless
> under some conditions, but I agree it does lack a little something. On the
> other hand, you recognised that it was sand quite readily! ;-)

You know, I think the only reason I mentioned the sand is that the 
texture on the blocks is so nice. :-) It makes the sand stand out as 
bland. :-P

BTW, it would be cool to see this image with radiosity. Bring it up the 
level of your 3D-rtc entry. ;-)

-- 
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you've ever "lost" a Julia 
fractal because you're not quite sure how to align things in four 
dimensions.
Dylan Beattie

Post a reply to this message