scam wrote:
> "scam" <sca### [at] mailusydeduau> wrote:
>> Because...
> 
> Try that again.

It seems to have worked the first time.

Very nice. I'm impressed how simple the blood-spatter is while still 
looking great. :-)

The eight is neat, too. It could use some ior and photons, though. 
<hint, hint>

(And to anyone who doesn't get the joke...Read the three numbers out loud.)

-- 
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
You know you've been raytracing too long when you are compulsive, 
neurotic, anti-social, paranoid and manic-depressive but basically happy.
Quietly Watching

Post a reply to this message