Well okay but I guess I have a philosophical question:
If I can't see these things when I look at it is that extra effort adding to 
the picture?

Or is it made for a smaller audience of people who can detect these 
subtleties?

Or am I completely missing the point?

-- 
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com


"Shay" <shay@s.s> wrote in message news:46472940@news.povray.org...
> Tek wrote:
>
>> So how were the letters chosen? The pattern looked random to me.
>
> I don't believe in technically deconstructing images. However, I will
> give one small, verifiable example of determination. My picture had to
> be compressed 50% to make the size limit, but you can still look and see
> that the colors are not mixed with any conventional CG method (add,
> subtract, multiply, divide, average), but with my own custom formula.
> You may consider the difference subtle (like the letter selection), but
> it is provably there without any revealing explanations or comparison
> renders.
>
> -Shay

Post a reply to this message