William Tracy wrote:
>> Just an idea, but perhaps the glasses could be really
>> close, and in fact the camera is looking through the lens to see part of
>> the cane behind it?

It just occurred to me that I could do that, and have the cane out of 
focus but in focus when looking through the glasses lenses. That would 
be neat. :-)

Unfortunately, I don't think there's any way I can get that to work 
before the deadline. :-P

-- 
William Tracy
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|a|f|i|s|h|i|o|n|a|d|o|@|g|m|a|i|l|.|c|o|m|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
|w|t|r|a|c|y|@|c|a|l|p|o|l|y|.|e|d|u|
+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+

You know you've been raytracing too long when your family thinks you are 
avoiding them.
Quietly Watching

Post a reply to this message