|
 |
Well real cameras have adjustable apertures, a photo taken outdoors in
fairly bright sunlight would not usually have the aperture open far enough
for this much blur, though it is possible with a filter. I just wanted to
get an upper limit for maximum possible blur within the bounds of reality.
Since it's more blur than I need I'm safely inside the bounds of reality
with whatever setting I choose!
--
Tek
http://evilsuperbrain.com
"Christian Froeschlin" <chr### [at] chrfr de> wrote in message
news:46215631$1@news.povray.org...
> Tek wrote:
>
>> But I think it's too blurry, so I'm gonna build some background objects.
>
> Maybe you are taking photorealism too far. If it's to blurry,
> why don't you just reduce the blur? Just think of the number
> of blur_samples you'll need to make this look good anyway ;)
>
> I suppose camera manufacturers would happily build cameras which show
> less blur if they could (well, in fact you can take multiple images
> with different focus and combine them in software).
Post a reply to this message
|
|
