virtualmeet <tah### [at] yahoofr> wrote:
> I'm doing some tests for more that 3
> months now and for me one thing is sure: writing a better math parser is
> impossible by using the same sheme, because the fparser is the best of it's
> kinde.

  Not true, actually. It could use JIT compiling, making it even faster.
(This has been an idea for years, but I have never got to actually do it.)

  OTOH, if you are making every operation to 64 items at a time in a loop,
then maybe JIT compiling won't make *that* significantly faster...

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message